Thursday, July 29, 2010
IUD issues
30 yo, G2/T 2, P2, A, 0, L 2, cesarean section for both births presents to WHNP after two unsuccessful attempts at IUD placement. Pt relates history of abnormal PAP smears, laser cone and cold knife procedures, suspected stenoic os. The patient underwent two attempts at IUD placement via two different clinicians both of which were unsuccessful despite attempts at sequential dilation. Management options of the patient include attempted placement in the clinic post intravaginal Cytotech 200mg x 2, or placement in outpatient surgery. Patient elects outpatient surgery option due to concerns about further discomforts expected without anesthesia.
Post insertion cramping and bleeding:
35 you G3/T 2, P 1, A 0, L3. Patient presents 6 days after initial IUD placement with complaints of bleeding (now stopped) and abdominal pain and cramping which is rated by the patient at 7/10. The patient denies fever chills, other signs/symptoms of infection. To this point abdominal pain has not been responsive to NSAID therapy. On physical exam the vault and os are free of blood. Strings to the copper IUD are evident at approximately 3 cm in length. There is no cervical motion tenderness, but the patient’s abdomen is tender to palpation. An ultrasound was performed that demonstrated the presence of the IUD inside the uterus. The patient was discharged with a 5 day supply of Percocet and instructed again concerning signs and symptoms of infection. The patient was also instructed to schedule a routine appointment in approximately 3 months.
Observations:
IUD placement is a common procedure but not best for every patient. Based on the first patient’s past history of Laser cone and cold knife procedures primary care providers would probably have be justified in referring the patient to the WHNP or obstetrician. Additionally, it is necessary to educate patient thoroughly concerning what symptoms to expect post insertion. Bleeding and cramping may persist for some time post insertion and patients need a warning in advance while at the same time being instructed concerning signs of complication e.g. infection, insertion though of the IUD through the wall of the uterus.
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
But my Pregnancy Test Was Negative!
She'd obtained her negative Hcg test the afternoon prior to the visit and was excited to have the IUD placed. However, as we reviewed her history of recent coital encounters, we learned that she'd had unprotected intercourse for the past three days.
We informed her that she was no longer a candidate for IUD placement in the event that she was actually already in the process of conceiving. To which she responded, "But my pregnancy test was negative and I had my period last month."
She overassumed the use of OCPs for mere management of dysmenorrhea and somehow failed to realize its additional "anti-contraceptive" benefits! So this is someone of a GYN/OB combo I recon. But the take home is...ensure that clients understand both the intent of the prescription of OCPs for a specific GYN issue but also ensure that they thoroughly understand the full range of physiologic consequences especially it's influence on fertility while consuming.
Monday, July 26, 2010
Gyn sickcall - Fibroids, fibroids and more fibroids
3 clients, same history . Client A: 38 y/o AA female with history of fibroids with symptoms (pelvic fullness, intense pain, and menometrorrhagia). S/P Tubal ligation x 16 years ago. Motrin and heat packs for relief – little good. Do a pelvic exam, bimanual exam, check for recent pap, if none present, do one. Maybe/maybe not order U/S now, assess CBC for anemia (palms of hand, skin, cap refill, oral mucosa and subconjunctival mucosa). Client B: 26 y/o WF, AD, nulliparous and celibate (virgin), asymptomatic, with significant family history (mother and aunts hysterectomy age 34 d/t recurrent fibroids), Client C: 45 y/o WF symptomatic abnormal uterine bleeding x 6 months, metromenorrhagia, microcytic anemia, history of tubal ligation >6 years with worsening symptoms after. NO RECENT CERVICAL/VAGINAL EXAM/PAP WITHIN LAST 2 YEARS, but there was a recent U/S order and result showing >12cm mass on the uterus. Whoever ordered the U/S did not do an exam.
For the asymptomatic pt we offered her 2 options: try a COC to try to suppress/ control the ovaries hormonal production (nuvaring) or wait another 3 months to revisit U/S to assess growth, if she did not want to start the BC measures. For the other 2 patients, treatment were similar. We scheduled them for endometrial biopsy, possible date for hysterectomy (assessed anesthesia and intubation status – sleep apnea, obesity, asthma, response to anesthesia etc) and my preceptor talked to them about starting Lupron till the date of surgery as a temp quick fix measure with f/u.
With these patients, I learnt that some providers tend to shy away from doing pelvic exam on the patients for whatever reason. Doesn’t do them much good, especially the ones that say, but I had one 2 years ago and “they” said I was fine, I think or I am not ready for one today, can I reschedule! Or I am only here to review the results of my U/S and Labs. We heard all these “reasons” today. So he says to me: Never be afraid to “get in there” and “do it.” You are not doing them any good! Eventually, it going to be done, but it may be too late! If it is a vaginal complaint, look at the vagina (inside not outside)!
Do the RECTOVAGINAL EXAM!
Recurring Themes During the Post-Menopausal Well Woman Exam
1.) Stenotic Os. The first issue was the stenotic os, particularly in nulliparous women. When obtaining a pap specimen from the stenotic os, it can be difficult to insert the brush or spatula into the os and lead to inadequate collection of endocervical cells from the SCJ or transformation zone. It is important to note on the report if the os was stenotic or not.
2.) Atrophic Vagina. The second issue was the atrophic vagina. The physical findings were similar from patient to patient. Friable tissue, scant and thin vaginal fluid, lack of rugae on the vaginal mucosa, and collapsing of the vaginal walls. Patients may or may not be symptomatic. It is important to be gentle with the pelvic exam and a smaller speculum may be needed as the tissue bleeds easily and is not as pliable.
3.) Small Uterus and Ovaries. The third issue was difficulty with palpating the uterus and ovaries. This is an expected finding because after menopause and as women age, these organs atrophies. You may need to palpate deeper when doing the bimanual which could be uncomfortable for some women. The point to remember is that an easily palpable uterus or ovary in a postmenopausal woman should raise your index of suspicion that something may not be right.
4.) Menopausal symptoms. The 4th and most complex issue was the vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause. The common complaints were insomnia, hot flashes, night sweats, irritability, and vaginal dryness. Some women were perimenopausal and some had 10 years + since menopause. What was common among most of these women, was that these symptoms were really affecting their quality of life. They also expressed feelings of isolation, because family, friends, coworkers did not understand how uncomfortable this time could be. It is important for FNPs to be understanding, reassuring, and knowledgeable about current therapies for menopausal vasomotor symptoms. Treatment can be complex and the options are numerous. These patients have usually been doing their own research about the options available and will ask questions that you cannot imagine. Having a good up to date resource about current therapies, myths, and facts regarding menopause is a must have in the family practice setting.
Sunday, July 25, 2010
To bleed or not to bleed
Saturday, July 24, 2010
LEEP/Implanon
The implant was actually done first, and it took about 10 minutes, from applying the local to removing the introducer and bandaging the site. It was simple quick and relatively painless. I could see some bruising beginning, and little bleeding.
I chose this case because it helped me in understanding the two procedures that I will eventually be describing to my patients. It also helped me to keep the different procedures for managing dysplasia straight in my own head.
49 y/o with Cystocele
Once she had left we discussed the impact of decreased estrogen level on post menopausal women and its effect on musculature. The one option I brought up was referral for pelvic muscle PT evaluation. I was told they were not in that area. I mentioned you could go through HBA/tricare to help find one in the area or I provided contact: kendra.harrington@amedd.army.mil, 202-782-5716. He felt like that was a valid point and would forward to head nurse to research for future patient referral.
Friday, July 23, 2010
Rhythm Method = Motherhood
mastodynia
greg bellanca
Unfortunately, the reason for repeat PAP at 7 mo and referral for colpo outside of guidelines was not documented in the record. Possible reasons included provider unfamiliarity with guidelines, the patient’s military status (shore vs sea duty), limited access to care, previous history not documented in record, increased risk factors. The patient is AD female on shore rotation for another 2 years, so pending sea duty rotation was not an issue as far as access to care. No history of STI, no other hx of abnormal PAP, completed Guardasil vaccine series, sexually active with 1 partner in last 12 months and 3 lifetime partners.
The WHNP discussed the lack of necessity to perform colpo at this point, but patient stated that it was not easy to get an appointment and she had already taken time off from work, so rather than wait a year and perhaps have to return, she elected to have the colposcopy performed.
Take home message for me with this patient was that it is imperative to know the current guidelines for PAP follow-up, and if going outside of those guidelines, document, document, document. It would have likely saved the patient from an unnecessary procedure, saved the provider a lot of time, and preserved the faith that the patient had in the referring provider.
The following website has the algorithms for cytology according to American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. http://www.asccp.org/consensus.shtml
22 year old WWE
42yo G3P2A1 Caucasian female presents for annual well woman examination, required prior to deployment to Afghanistan. Patient reports “twisting” left lower quadrant pain since 2003. Adenxal tenderness noted on left side during bimanual. PMH: No hx of STDs; Breast cancer (right)-estrogen/progesterone related in 2006; endometriosis diagnosed while having bilateral tubal ligation performed in 2003. Had pelvic US performed in 2009, ovarian cysts, less than 3cm in size identified; LGSIL in 1990 (no other abnormal paps reported) lumpectomy performed 2006. Family history: Mom with history of uterine cancer. Patient currently followed by breast care center. Patient is due to deploy in August. Patient’s previous US report did not indicate repeat recommendations. Differentials: PCOS, endometriosis, uterine cancer. A pelvic US was ordered and a referral to Oncology was ordered. An oncologist has not followed the patient since 2006 and for further evaluation/recommendations as it relates to her symptoms. The challenge for this case is how to manage the patient’s current problem as it relates to the time constraints involved with the deployment.
Thursday, July 22, 2010
First Well Woman Nightmare!
OCP, Cellulitis and Hernia...Oh My!
Friday, July 16, 2010
Do your whole interview, not part of it.
Prescription/treatment quaqmire
This is an interesting case because it was a telecon during my rotation. The provider had seen a 16 y/o Hispanic female patient in March and completed PAP, pelvic and cultures. Patient had positive GC culture. Provider called patient, notified her of results and ordered antibiotics for her to pick up at the MTF pharmacy. Provider keeps a personal log to ensure patients pick up prescriptions when positive cultures involved. Patient never picked up rx so she called her and found that patient had lost her ID card and unable to get on base or pick up her medications. Provider asked patient if she was still having sex and patient stated she was but her boyfriend had been treated. Provider discussed with patient that both required treatment at the same time otherwise the infection could reoccur in treated partner. Patient then asked for civilian prescription to be called into network pharmacy. Provider did so but patient called back stating the pharmacy never received order. Provider called CVS and pharmacist stated they had order and it was good. She had to leave multiple telephone messages before patient called back and stated the pharmacist told her the order was not active. Provider put patient, pharmacist and herself on conference call eventually because patient kept calling clinic stating there was no active prescription at the place she requested. Provider thought that this case was now resolved. Patient then called clinic a few weeks later stating her father has her insurance card and she cannot get it from him. She did not want to tell him why she needed it. Provider directed patient to contact her local health dept to obtain free or low cost treatment if she was unable to get on base or use her insurance card or cash at local pharmacy to pick up her medications. Patient stated she would contact the local health dept. Two weeks later patient called again to say she got a new military ID card and wanted to make sure the antibiotic prescription at the MTF was still available/active because her mother would drive her to the clinic. The patient had still not picked up the prescription at the MTF by the time my clinical rotation was complete.
In this instance could the provider have contacted her parents? Called the front gate to sponsor her on base? I do not know if she had a driver’s license/car and I am not sure if she lived in DC, VA or MD or the distance she had to travel to get to MTF. The metro station is a few miles away from this location. I never looked up her address so unsure what state law applies to the situation. It boggled my mind that so many hours and effort had been expended and the patient had still not received treatment by mid-June after a diagnosis in March.